Amir Taboul is the winner of my book giveaway! Congrats, Amir!
So, the original version of my print book ended up having a messed up cover. The color was off and there were strange artifacts all over. I was able to fix this, and the printers sent me a copy to verify that it truly was. Soooo, I now have an extra copy of my book, which I will now be giving away!
I’ll be doing a random drawing for it. To enter, simply send me an email at email@example.com that says something along the lines of “I wanna win!”. The last day to enter is May 25th. On the 26th, I will choose randomly from the emails, then email you back to get the address to send the book to. I will be covering shipping costs, so everything is completely free to you!
Whoa! Two days in a row, I’ve found some good posts worth sharing! Today’s article presents somewhat of a counterpoint to an older blog post I’d read about classes never being named after what they do, but what they are; that they should always be actual objects in the real world. I never could quite bring myself to accept what this person had said, especially about Factories being a bad thing (I wish I could show you guys the article). Now, this new article actually articulates a defense against the opposite. I hope you all enjoy it!
With a clickbait-y title like This One Simple Change for Better Class Naming Will Blow Your Mind, this short article really gives one little trick that makes naming some of our classes easier. Check it out, guys!
So here’s my attempt at accomplishing the closest thing possible toward making object literals in Python. Continue Reading